Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down Challenge to 'One Person, One Vote'

The State of Texas will not be able to deviate from the way it draws its legislative districts.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday, unanimously, mind you, that the Lone Star State must continue drawing its districts based on total population rather than eligible voters.

Reuters reports that a conservative challenge to the one-person, one-vote standard sought to shift influence in state-wide races to rural areas and away from urban areas. 

The Texas Tribune explains the reasoning behind the conservative challenge:

Last year, two Texas voters, Sue Evenwel of Mount Pleasant and Edward Pfenninger of Montgomery County north of Houston, brought a case to the Supreme Court arguing that Texas should divide its districts by the number of eligible voters, not by the total population. Evenwel and Pfenninger argued that the power of Pfenninger's vote was comparatively diminished because he had a greater proportion of non-voters in his districts.
The Supreme Court did not agree, saying such a move would fly in the face of Constitutional history. 

One Person One Vote Ruling


Since 1986, the SA Current has served as the free, independent voice of San Antonio, and we want to keep it that way.

Becoming an SA Current Supporter for as little as $5 a month allows us to continue offering readers access to our coverage of local news, food, nightlife, events, and culture with no paywalls.

Join today to keep San Antonio Current.

Scroll to read more San Antonio News articles

Join SA Current Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.