Support Local Journalism, Join the SA Current Press Club.

Hereafter 

click to enlarge screens_hereafter_cmyk.jpg
Critic's Pick Hereafter
Release Date: 2010-10-20
Genre: Film

Like life itself, Hereafter is a sometimes tedious amble to a vaguely unsatisfying end. But, then again, there are plenty of small details that make it worth a go, and the ending, full of promise but no final answers is like, well, many of our conceptions of the actual hereafter. Or the void. Or whatever.

As a director, Clint Eastwood relies on traits from his earlier films, gorgeous location shots and strong acting, and ventures into some new territory, like an action film-worthy tsunami sequence and shots of the afterlife straight out of SyFy. He even scored the film.

Like all of his previous directorial efforts, this Eastwood joint retains a titanium emotional core, and that’s what sells this “thriller.” At its heart, writer Peter Morgan (The Queen, The Last King of Scotland, Frost/Nixon) has taken his studious depiction of real-life characters and put that talent to work making the unbelievable believable. Marie Lelay (Cecile de France) is a hard-hitting television journalist in Paris who literally gets swept away in a tsunami and comes out of it with what she calls “visions” from a near death experience. Further stretching the limits of credulity is George Lonegan (Matt Damon), a reluctant psychic who would rather work at a San Francisco sugar factory than make money off his ghost-whispering abilities. Finally, the most touching tale is of Marcus and Jason, two adorable twin scamps with a drug-addicted mum in merry old — sorry, I meant bleakly gray — England. The only thing truly unbelievable about the twins is that their lives could be so horrible.

The 130-minute film takes its sweet time setting up each character’s back story and prepping for a meet-up reminiscent of Crash or Babel. Indeed, more than a few scenes seemed far too long (Marcus walking into the London tube, Lonegan feeding a giggly gal pal during a cooking class, Lelay dining at numerous fancy Parisian restaurants), but the audience at least has a fuller conception of the characters. Each gives a different voice to our human reaction to death. Lonegan wants to run away from it, Lelay is obsessively curious, and Marcus just wishes it hadn’t come so soon for a loved one. At long last their paths intersect and each is able to help the other come to terms with their relationship to the hereafter. It’s an ending that seems a bit too neat, until you realize that an entire movie about the afterlife has not really posed any definite answers.

A thriller this ain’t, but it does leave the audience walking out of the theater pensively, waiting for what comes next.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the San Antonio Current Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the San Antonio Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

October 20, 2021

View more issues

Newsletters

Join SA Current Newsletters

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Calendar

© 2021 San Antonio Current

Website powered by Foundation