Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Local Leaders’ Treatment of Latin-American Residents in the ’30s Offers Lesson on How We Should Respond to the Current Crisis

Posted By on Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:03 AM

click to enlarge FARM SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - OFFICE OF WAR INFORMATION PHOTOGRAPH COLLECTION (LIBRARY OF CONGRESS)
  • Farm Security Administration - Office of War Information Photograph Collection (Library of Congress)
Editor’s Note: The following is CityScrapes, a column of opinion and analysis.

In these fraught and uncertain times, the measure of a community is how it deals with its neediest and most vulnerable. As we face the impact of the novel coronavirus, we need to recognize the lessons and failures of the past and consider the broader needs and imperatives of a true community.

By the fall of 1939, San Antonio was a decade into the dislocation and ravages of the Great Depression. Some in this city faced a particularly difficult situation, after the city’s notorious pecan shelling plants closed and piece-work garment manufacturing shut down in the face of wage requirements under the Federal Wage and Hour Law. Local social workers, led by Brother Herbert Leies of St. Mary’s University, pressed city and county government leaders to take action, painting a “picture of ‘slow starvation’ in San Antonio.” Maury Maverick, the mayor at the time, said he’d discovered “90 per cent of the children in West side clinics were suffering from malnutrition.”

Maverick joined with County Judge Charles W. Anderson in mid-September 1939 in appointing a special Welfare Investigation Committee to assess local relief needs. The government leaders looked to a number of the city’s most prominent business and civic leaders, with the committee chaired by Col. W. B. Tuttle, president of the San Antonio Public Service Company, the predecessor to CPS Energy. Tuttle was joined by banker Franz Groos, hotelier Gus Menger, Standard Electric President Leo Dubinski and others, charged to provide a “true picture” of the needs of San Antonio-area residents.



The fact-finding group delivered a report the following month, documenting the millions spent the prior year on work relief, primarily by the federal government. The report also acknowledged “a great deal of malnutrition, particularly among the children of Latin-American extraction.” But after noting the problem of low wage industries in San Antonio, the report focused on just one portion of the city’s populace:

“The committee finds that in San Antonio and its suburbs the Latin-American population is the most serious problem,” the authors wrote. “San Antonio formerly was home of a great many persons of Latin-American extraction who played a leading role in making the cotton crop in Texas. … The tremendous shrinkage in the cotton acreage and crop in Texas resulted in the concentration of many of these people in San Antonio without means of support and has placed a burden locally of taking care of the machinery that formerly served a large part of the southwest.”

And the response of these business leaders to the “burden” of this population?
“The Latin-American population constitutes a large racial minority, and at its present rate of increase will soon become a racial majority in San Antonio,” they explained. “The schools are already crowded with children of Latin-American extraction. The committee believes that there are many Latin-Americans in San Antonio for whom there is not opportunity for gainful employment in the near future. For that reason, it is believed that consideration should be given to the redistribution of population, and that some of these families should voluntarily return to the small towns and farms from which they have come, and that other families should be repatriated.”
Rather, alien populations weren’t assisted by relief in other countries, and “[i]t therefore seems only fair that the matter of repatriation be considered carefully both by the City of San Antonio and the Mexican Government.”

The views of these leading lights of San Antonio business community were not shared by others in the city. A group led by Rabbi David Jacobson of Temple Beth El succeeded in pressing Mayor Maverick and the city commission to fund a more substantial, independent analysis of local welfare needs and the role of public and private agencies in meeting them. Yet it is vital to recognize that for some here, malnutrition and slow starvation were simply seen as not our problem.

Now, as thousands of San Antonio’s working people face unemployment and financial distress, we need our leaders — public and private, for profit and nonprofit — to build a contemporary relief and support system, one that recognizes that we here are in this together, and that we cannot necessarily rely on the state or national government to sustain us.

Heywood Sanders is a professor of public policy at the University of Texas at San Antonio.

Stay on top of San Antonio news and views. Sign up for our Weekly Headlines Newsletter.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

We’re keeping you informed…
...and it’s what we love to do. From local politics and culture to national news that hits close to home, San Antonio Current has been keeping San Antonio informed for years.

It’s never been more important to support local news sources. A free press means accountability and a well-informed public, and we want to keep our unique and independent reporting available for many, many years to come.

If quality journalism is important to you, please consider a donation to San Antonio Current. Every reader contribution is valuable and so appreciated, and goes directly to support our coverage of critical issues and neighborhood culture. Thank you.

Read the Digital Print Issue

March 25, 2020

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Calendar

© 2020 San Antonio Current

Website powered by Foundation