Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones speaks to reporters over the weekend about moving San Antonio’s municipal elections. Credit: Michael Karlis

Moving San Antonio’s off-year municipal elections from May to November, which at first appeared to be a slam-dunk proposal from Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones, got a surprising amount of pushback at a Wednesday City Council session.

​Indeed, the proposal has drawn endorsements from former mayors Henry Cisneros, Nelson Wolff, Phil Hardberger, Julián Castro and Ron Nirenberg.

​Jones began the meeting by inviting Rice University political scientist Melissa Marschall to discuss research showing that shifting municipal elections to November increases voter turnout, saves money and draws low-income and younger voters who normally stay at home.

​Despite the testimony and endorsements by former city leaders, a majority of council members were either on the fence or expressed staunch opposition to the idea.

​District 10 Councilman Marc Whyte said he opposes the move because San Antonio voters won’t get a chance vote on it in a ballot initiative. When Dallas moved its municipal elections to November, voters had a say in the matter, he said.

San Antonio is the only large city in Texas to not have unified elections in odd-year contests, and it also has among the lowest voter turnouts among Texas cities.

Meanwhile, District 1 Councilwoman Sukh Kaur and District 5 Councilwoman Teri Castillo questioned whether San Antonio’s numerous, already underfunded school districts would be forced to foot the bill for their elections if they’re still to occur in May.

​District 7 Councilwoman Marina Alderete Gavito, who’s been a vocal opponent of Jones and is rumored to be gearing up for a 2029 mayoral run, questioned the cost-saving figures offered by City Manager Erik Walsh.

​In recent weeks, Jones has said that moving the city’s off-year elections to November would save San Antonio $800,000 and $1 million per cycle. However, Walsh told council that those figures were more or less a guesstimate and not rooted in hard data.

​“The cost of the elections is administered and borne by the county elections office,” Walsh told council. “We don’t have a breakdown or details about what future [costs] are. We can show you what the past is, because the future is based on who all is on the ballot.”

​Walsh continued: “This isn’t necessarily cost-saving. We’re not reducing the budget or balancing the budget. Cost is a factor here, but it’s more of a policy conversation.”

​Only District 2’s Councilman’s Jalen McKee-Rodriguez, District 3’s Phyllis Viagran and District 4’s Edward Mungia said they were in full support of Jones’ proposal.

​Jones initially said she planned to add a vote on the matter to council’s Dec. 18 agenda. However, the vote hasn’t yet been scheduled as of press time.

​San Antonio City Council only has until Dec. 31 to decide whether to move the elections before a window set by the Texas Legislature expires.

​Stay tuned.


Sign Up for SA Current newsletters.

Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed


Michael Karlis is a multimedia journalist at the San Antonio Current, whose coverage in print and on social media focuses on local and state politics. He is a graduate of American University in Washington,...