A group of congressional Democrats is demanding that President Trump’s inaugural committee explain a rash of financial inconsistencies in filings it made about contributions from corporations including San Antonio-based USAA.
The letter, exclusively obtained by news site NOTUS and signed by 17 Democratic House members, calls out the Trump Vance 2025 Inaugural Committee for discrepancies in the way it reported contributions not just from USAA, a leading insurance and financial services firm, but also some of the nation’s largest and highest-profile businesses.
“Several major corporations, including General Motors, Amazon, Microsoft and USAA, disclosed contribution amounts to Congress that significantly exceed what the Committee originally reported to the Federal Election Commission (FEC),” stated the letter, signed by frequent Trump adversaries including U.S. Reps. Jamie Raskin, a former Trump impeachment manager, and Jasmine Crockett, an outspoken MAGA critic representing a Dallas-area district.
For example, the committee initially reported receiving $1 million from General Motors, according to the letter, but the company later confirmed that it ponied up $538,000 of in-kind vehicle donations in addition to the cash donation.
“In another instance, USAA stated it gave $100,000 from its corporate treasury, while the committee reported the funds came from the company’s political action committee (PAC) — a meaningful legal distinction under campaign finance law,” the letter continued.
Officials with USAA, one of San Antonio’s largest private-sector employers, were unavailable for comment on the committee’s reporting discrepancy, which the Current was able to confirm with federal documents.
In their letter, the House Democrats said they’re aware the inaugural committee eventually filed amended reports resolving discrepancies related to USAA, Amazon, Microsoft and GM.
“Nonetheless, the initial underreporting and subsequent delayed revisions raise ongoing concerns,” the lawmakers added.
The letter gives the Trump inaugural committee until Sept. 26 to explain why it took months to correct its inaccurate filings and explain what processes it has in place to ensure accurate financial reporting. The Dems also asked the committee whether it’s communicated with the FEC about the discrepancies and whether the agency contacted it about possible campaign law violations.
The House members said the discrepancies are alarming against the administration’s backdrop of record growth in inaugural fundraising. The Trump Vance 2025 Inaugural Committee raked in $239 million, or more than double the previous record of $107 million, set by Trump in 2017.
“These concerns are heightened by reporting that each of the top three individual donors to the 2025 inaugural committee received formal nominations for roles in the Trump administration,” the letter stated. “While presidents have historically awarded positions to major donors, the scale of contributions linked to appointments in this instance is unprecedented and raises serious concerns about the role of inaugural giving in federal decisions. Further, several major business entities have received favorable legal determinations from the Trump administration after making sizable donations.”
Sign Up for SA Current newsletters.
Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed
