Support Local Journalism, Join the SA Current Press Club.

EarthTalk: Fluoride remains a contentious issue more than a decade after San Antonio’s adoption 

After an earlier unsuccessful push for public-water fluoridation, San Antonio voters approved a ballot initiative in 2000 making public-water fluoridation the law inside city limits. It was a close vote, with only 52.6 percent voting in favor of the change, for one of the last metropolitan holdouts in the U.S. While Edwards Aquifer water delivered by the city-owned San Antonio Water System already contains fluoride at 0.3 parts per million, the utility began adding fluoride to bring that ratio up to 0.8 parts per million in 2002. Though Bexar Metropolitan Water District fluoridates most of the water it supplies within city limits, the utility does not add fluoride in other areas, where the natural fluoride concentration ranges from 0 ppm to 0.4 ppm, according to data on file with the Centers for Disease Control. Under pressure from a variety of sources, not least of all poor fiscal performance, Bexar Met’s board of directors flirted with the idea that they should stop spiking the water supply with fluoride last year — until they realized that with growing public pressure to dismantle the utility mounting, the fluoride fight was one they could not afford to take on. — Greg Harman


Dear EarthTalk: So, what’s the story: Is it good that we have fluoride in our tap water or not? I’ve heard so many conflicting opinions over the years.

-- Benjamin P., Mission, Kan.

The debate over whether we should add fluoride to public drinking water has raged since the 1940s when American cities first initiated the practice as a way to fight the scourge of tooth decay. The benefits of more research and hindsight in recent years have led many policymakers to reconsider the merits of so-called artificial fluoridation. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that today over 60 percent of Americans get fluoridated drinking water from their taps whether they want it or not.

Critics of the practice worry that we are exposing ourselves to much more fluoride — which can be problematic in the extreme — than is necessary to fight tooth decay. After all, some fluoride, which is a naturally occurring mineral, finds its way into food and drinking water, typically in low concentrations, without human intervention. And most of us, kids included, use fluoride toothpaste twice a day.

So what’s the risk, anyway? According to the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), over-exposure to fluoride can be toxic, causing dental fluorosis (mottling and loss of tooth enamel) and skeletal fluorosis (joint pain, stiffness, and bone fractures). “Some studies point to a possible link between fluoride exposure and osteosarcoma (bone cancer), neurotoxicity, and disruption of thyroid function,” says EWG.

Proponents of fluoridation argue that the benefits of adding it to drinking water far outweigh any potential risks. Various studies have shown that fluoridating drinking water can indeed lead to as much as a 40-percent reduction in cavities in populations of both kids and adults. But studies evaluating other areas that do not artificially fluoridate — such as throughout most of Europe — have shown similar improvements in recent decades, perhaps thanks to increased attention to teeth by family and school health care practitioners.

Regardless, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently announced a lowering of the maximum recommended fluoride level for municipal water from 1.2 ppm to 0.7 ppm.

“We’ve had to wait too long, but the government’s announcement marks a belated recognition that many American children are at risk from excess fluoride in drinking water and other sources,” says EWG’s Jane Houlihan. “HHS has taken an important first step. Now it’s up to water utilities to respond and for the `U.S. Environmental Protection Agency` to lower its too-high legal limit on fluoride in drinking water, which is more than five times the new maximum being recommended by the `HHS`.”

You can check to see if your water is fluoridated, and if so, how much, via the CDC’s My Water’s Fluoride website. If it is, you can also invest in a filter that removes it. However, they are not cheap: Countertop water distillers go for $200 and up, and an activated alumina defluoridation filter — most come in cartridge form and can be placed in-line under counters — are costly, too, and need to be changed out frequently. Unfortunately, the most popular and less expensive home water filters, like those from PUR and Brita, do not remove fluoride. •

EarthTalk is written and edited by Roddy Scheer and Doug Moss and is a registered trademark of E - The Environmental Magazine ( Send questions to [email protected]

Tags: ,

Support Local Journalism.
Join the San Antonio Current Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the San Antonio Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

January 12, 2022

View more issues


Join SA Current Newsletters

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.


© 2022 San Antonio Current

Website powered by Foundation