Judge rules feds have right to cut Texas' razor wire on border

However, the judge questioned why the federal government forces asylum seekers to cross the Rio Grande instead of receiving them at ports of entry.

click to enlarge Razor wire strung up by the Texas Military Department blocks access from the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass. - Michael Karlis
Michael Karlis
Razor wire strung up by the Texas Military Department blocks access from the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass.
A federal judge on Wednesday ruled that Border Patrol agents may continue cutting razor wire Texas strung up along the Rio Grande to thwart illegal migration, the Texas Tribune reports.

At the same time, U.S. District Judge Alia Moses of Del Rio questioned why the Biden administration doesn't make it easier for migrants to claim asylum at points of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to the article.

The current federal system forces migrants to wade through the dangerous waters of the Rio Grande, the judge opined, noting that Border Patrol agents are cutting the wire to save lives of migrants. In that regard, the feds are responding to problems “of their own creation," she added.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration last month after Border Patrol agents cut through the razor wire laid out along the banks of the Rio Grande by the Texas Military Department. Paxton alleged the agents were illegally destroying state property as they vied to save migrants from drowning.

In her ruling, Moses said Texas didn’t provide enough evidence to show the federal government was breaking the law, according to the Tribune.

Paxton’s office appealed Moses’ order to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday, according to the news site.

Although Moses sided with the federal government, she said the White House should give migrants a safer means of seeking asylum.

“Any rational observer could not help but wonder why the Defendants do not just allow migrants to access the country at a port of entry,” Moses wrote. “If agents are going to allow migrants to enter the country, and indeed facilitate their doing so, why make them undertake the dangerous task of crossing the river? Would it not be easier, and safer, to receive them at a port of entry?”

The federal government does allow some asylum seekers to be received by agents at ports of entry. However, migrants must make an appointment online, and only 1,450 daily appointments are available across the entire U.S.-Mexico border, the Tribune reports.

With limited appointments and migrants lacking regular access to the internet, many opt to cross the border illegally to be then received by border agents and be processed for asylum, experts told the Tribune.

Subscribe to SA Current newsletters.

Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter| Or sign up for our RSS Feed

KEEP SA CURRENT!

Since 1986, the SA Current has served as the free, independent voice of San Antonio, and we want to keep it that way.

Becoming an SA Current Supporter for as little as $5 a month allows us to continue offering readers access to our coverage of local news, food, nightlife, events, and culture with no paywalls.

Join today to keep San Antonio Current.

Scroll to read more Texas News articles

Michael Karlis

Michael Karlis is a Staff Writer at the San Antonio Current. He is a graduate of American University in Washington, D.C., whose work has been featured in Salon, Alternet, Creative Loafing Tampa Bay, Orlando Weekly, NewsBreak, 420 Magazine and Mexico Travel Today. He reports primarily on breaking news, politics...

Join SA Current Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.