Supreme Court rules feds can cut through wire Texas deployed along border

Texas AG Ken Paxton sued the federal government in October after border patrol agents were caught cutting through the wire the state installed along the Rio Grande.

click to enlarge Texas Gov. Greg Abbott deployed concertina wire along the Rio Grande this past summer as part of Operation Lone Star. - Michael Karlis
Michael Karlis
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott deployed concertina wire along the Rio Grande this past summer as part of Operation Lone Star.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Monday that U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents can cut through concertina wire deployed along the banks of the Rio Grande as part of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Operation Lone Star immigration crackdown.

The decision fell along ideological lines with the court's most conservative justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — all siding with Texas. Although the court didn't give a reason for its ruling, it appears to uphold earlier precedent giving the U.S. government, not states, immigration-enforcement authority.

Abbott deployed the concertina wire along the Texas-Mexico over the summer, and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton subsequently sued the federal government, alleging Border Patrol agents were caught cutting through the wire. The AG's office accused the agents of trespassing and damaging state property.

Initially, a federal judge ruled in the Biden Administration's favor. However, the notoriously conservative New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last month overturned that ruling.

Monday's high ruling could offer a hint which way the Supreme Court is likely to rule on a separate showdown between the state and feds along the border.

Abbott and the Biden administration are locked in a standoff over Texas National Guard Troops' seizure of a park from federal agents in Eagle Pass earlier this month. The Biden administration has also asked the high court to intervene in that dispute.

Southern Methodist University political science professor Cal Jillson said court precedent suggests the White House is likely in line for another victory.

"Abbott hopes [the Supreme Court] will rule differently and say that states can protect their own borders," Jillson told the Current. "But, I doubt that will happen because immigration historically has been a federal issue, and while the Supreme Court has been willing to overturn long-standing precedence, I doubt they will allow [states] to control the borders."

Subscribe to SA Current newsletters.

Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter| Or sign up for our RSS Feed

KEEP SA CURRENT!

Since 1986, the SA Current has served as the free, independent voice of San Antonio, and we want to keep it that way.

Becoming an SA Current Supporter for as little as $5 a month allows us to continue offering readers access to our coverage of local news, food, nightlife, events, and culture with no paywalls.

Join today to keep San Antonio Current.

Scroll to read more Texas News articles

Michael Karlis

Michael Karlis is a Staff Writer at the San Antonio Current. He is a graduate of American University in Washington, D.C., whose work has been featured in Salon, Alternet, Creative Loafing Tampa Bay, Orlando Weekly, NewsBreak, 420 Magazine and Mexico Travel Today. He reports primarily on breaking news, politics...

Join SA Current Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.